Cialis Lawsuit

A Brief Guide to Filing a Cialis Lawsuit


Cialis: Side Effects and FDA Updates

Since its introduction to the market, the FDA has issued two updates regarding Cialis side effects. These warnings have not led to significant litigation against the erectile dysfunction medication. While some people may have obtained a Cialis settlement due to adverse reactions to the drug, these results have not yet been made public. Therefore, at this time there is no significant precedent for a Cialis lawsuit.

Cialis side effects are not exclusive; other erectile dysfunction medications feature similar aftereffects.
Common Cialis side effects include:

• Headache (up to 15 percent of users)

• Facial Flushing (up to 3 percent of users)

• Dyspepsia or Indigestion (up to 10 percent of people)

• Back Pain (up to 6 percent of people)

• Nasal Congestion (up to 4 percent of people)

• Pain in arms or legs (up to 3 percent of people)

In 2005, the first warning issued by the FDA concerned the risk of developing a vision condition known as NAOIN. This is a temporary or permanent sudden loss of vision in one eye. Many of those who have experienced this Cialis side effect had another contributing condition, such as hypertension.

Whenever the FDA updates its warnings concerning a drug, litigation generally follows. However, there is no report of a significant Cialis lawsuit filed by anyone who developed NAOIN. Similarly, a 2007 announcement that Cialis side effects might include a sudden hearing loss did not prompt litigation. A review of the FDA's databases found 29 reported cases of hearing loss associated with erectile dysfunction medication.

Cialis Litigation History:

Since issuing these warnings, there has been no further development in people seeking a Cialis settlement. In 2011, the FDA approved use of the drug for treatment of benign hypostatic hyperplasia. This is a condition that makes it difficult to urinate. No Cialis lawsuit has been filed by any patient who was taking the drug for this purpose.

Anyone who wishes to file a Cialis lawsuit may have exceeded the statute of limitations. It is impossible to say whether anyone who wishes to sue over past adverse reactions has exceeded their window of opportunity for a Cialis settlement. However, warnings over potential Cialis side effects have been present for years; a potential plaintiff would have difficulty seeking a Cialis settlement on the grounds that they were not sufficiently cautioned about the risks of taking the drug.

It is always possible that future studies will discover more risks justifying a Cialis lawsuit. At present; however, anyone who experiences hearing or vision loss among their Cialis side effects may have difficulty seeking compensation. That being said, you should not have any difficulty finding an attorney willing to evaluate the likelihood of being awarded a Cialis settlement for free.

If you believe you have grounds for a Cialis lawsuit, you must speak with an attorney who is experienced with personal injury or drug litigation. An attorney may be aware of a recent out-of-court Cialis settlement that has not been publicized.. Once you have filed suit, you will be eligible for a Cialis settlement regardless of how long the legal system takes to resolve your case. Failure to instigate a Cialis lawsuit may result in the expiration of the statute of limitations. If so, you will not be able to receive a Cialis settlement.

Sources:

1. United States National Library of Medicine “Tadalafil” retrieved from

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000252/

2. FDA Announces Revisions to Labels for Cialis, Levitra and Viagra".

Food and Drug Administration. 2007-10-18.

3. United States Food and Drug Administration “Cialis information” retrieved from:

http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm118686.html